Seven Steps to Limited Monarchy

  • Rule under James I

    Rule under James I
    James I was a monarch who believed in the Divine Right of Kings, and did not want to give any power to his parliament. He angered his parliament by creating impositions, a type of tax, without their approval. Under his rule groups seeking religous freedom, like the Seperatists and Puritans, moved to the New World. Moreover, his rule was plagued by scandal and patronage. The harsh rule of James I led to parliament's desire to assert itself more.
  • Petition of Right

    Petition of Right
    This legislation required the monarch to consult with parliament before creating new taxes, imprisoning people without cause, and quartering troops in private homes. Charles was forced to acknowledge this petition in order to be granted funds for a costly war with Spain. This document gave more power to the parliament.
  • Period: to

    Long Parliament

    This parliament established major change in the English Government. Abolishing royal courts, and establishing tighter laws for the monarchy, this parliament was able to gain more power and traction in the Government.
  • Militia Ordinance

    Militia Ordinance
    This was passed in the House of Commons allowing parliament to create a militia. This was done in reaction to King Charles invading Congress. This created Civil War, and eventually more power for the parliament.
  • Execution of Charles I

    Execution of Charles I
    After the execution of Charles I parliament abolished the monarchy, House of Lords, and Anglican Church, in an assertion of power.
  • The Bill of Rights

    The Bill of Rights
    This bill subsantially limited the power of the monarchy, and was recognized by William and Mary. The bill also protected civil liberties, but only to upper classes. Furthermore, it prevented Catholics from taking the throne.
  • Period: to

    Sir Walpole's Rise to Power

    Sir Walpole was able to rule the parliament and government, and with his power England flourished. His power reflected how much weaker the monarch was, and the ability for England to flourish without an absolute monarch.