Unit 5 Timeline Project:Politics(1836-1861)

By ndickie
  • Period: to

    Abolitionism

    Reform movement in the 1830's that drew on the religious enthusiasm of the Second Great Awakening. Abolitionists condemned slavery as a sin and demanded immediate, uncompensated emancipation. Their uncompromising stance led to fierce political debates, urban riots, and sectional conflict.
  • Gag Rule

    Gag Rule
    The gag rule was adopted by the House of Representatives. Under this informal agreement, which remained in force until 1844, the House automatically tabled antislavery petitions, keeping the explosive issue of slavery off the congressional stage. John Quincy Adams led the effort to end the gag rule.
  • Texas Independence

    Texas Independence
    Fearing central control from Santa Anna and his push for national authority throughout Mexico, the war party in Texas provoked a rebellion that most of the American settlers ultimately supported. On March 2, 1836, the American rebels proclaimed the independence of Texas and adopted a constitution legalizing slavery.
  • John C. Calhoun and the Whigs

    John C. Calhoun and the Whigs
    Calhoun believed in class divisions in society. He also believed that northern Whigs' rhetoric of equal opportunity was contradicted by both slavery and the wage-labor system of industrial capitalism. He considered slavery a fundamental American institution. He also urged slave owners and factory owners to unite against their common foe: the working class of enslaved blacks and property-less whites.
  • President John Tyler

    President John Tyler
    John Tyler took over the presidency after Harrison died of pneumonia. He was firmly committed to slavery and states' rights. John Tyler was formerly a Whig, but got himself kicked off of the party when he started making decisions that his party opposed. He had an initiative to annex Texas which made the election of 1844 a political contest and led to the war with Mexico in 1846.
  • Period: to

    Know Nothing Movement(American Party)

    The "Know Nothings" were a movement that opposed immigration and Catholics. With the collapse of the Whig Party after the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act they became the new major party in opposition to the Democrats. They sought a middle ground between anti-slavery and pro-slavery positions. After the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sanford case and the further opposition to slavery in the North, many Know Nothings merged into the Republican Party.
  • President James K. Polk

    President James K. Polk
    James K. Polk, the Democrats' candidate for presidency in the election of 1844. Polk campaigned for the "Re-occupation of Oregon and the Re-annexation of Texas." He insisted that the United States defy British claims and occupy "The whole of the territory of Oregon" to the Alaskan border. This was when he came up with the jingoistic cry of "Fifty-four forty or fight".
  • Period: to

    War with Mexico

    President Polk sent forces to California and urged the Calofornios to seek independence and union with the United States. He sent an "exploring" party of soldiers into Mexican territory. He then sent John Slidell to Mexico to secure the Rio Grande boundary for Texas and to buy the provinces of California and New Mexico for $30 million, but the proposal was rejected and war seemed to be inevitable. When war broke out, Polk was ready and the Americans easily claimed victory and forced a peace.
  • Wilmot Proviso

    Wilmot Proviso
    Proposed by David Wilmot, an antislavery Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania, the Wilmot Proviso was a ban on slavery in any territories gained from the war with Mexico. Whigs and antislavery Democrats in the House of Representatives quickly passed the bill, dividing Congress along sectional lines. Fearing the outcome to be the end of the Union, a few proslavery northern senators joined their southern colleagues to kill the proviso.
  • Period: to

    Free Soil Party

    The free soil party was a single-issue party that opposed the westward expansion of slavery into the newly acquired territories. Formed from anti-slavery Democrats joined with anti-slavery Whigs and the Liberty Party. With the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act the party was revitalized and began to get absorbed into the Republican Party.
  • Period: to

    Barnburners vs Hunkers

    The Barnburners and the Hunkers were 2 opposing factions of the New York state Democratic Party. The main issue between them was the topic of slavery, the Barnburners being anti-slavery and the Hunkers being pro-slavery. This division in New York politics reflected that of the national divisions of the US preceding the American Civil War.
  • Compromise of 1850

    Compromise of 1850
    A collective of five separate laws. The first was the Fugitive Slave Act to mollify the South. The second being the admittance of California as a free stave to satisfy the North. The third was the resolve of a boundary dispute between New Mexico and Texas in favor of New Mexico. The fourth was to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. The fifth was to organize the rest of the conquered Mexican lands into the territories of New Mexico and Utah, and allow popular sovereignty.
  • Kansas-Nebraska Act

    Kansas-Nebraska Act
    A bill sent forth by Senator Stephen A. Douglas, which he amended in order to win the support of the South. He repealed the Missouri Compromise and organized the trans-Mississippi west on the basis of popular sovereignty. He agreed to the formation of two territories, Nebraska and Kansas. The Senate passed the bill, but just barely.
  • Dred Scott v. Sanford

    Dred Scott v. Sanford
    A supreme Court case that raised the controversial issue of Congress's constitutional authority over slavery. Dred Scott was an enslaved African American who had lived for a time with his owner in the free state of Illinois. Scott claimed that he was a free man. Roger B. Taney declared that Negroes, whether enslaved or free, could not be citizens of the United States and that Scott therefore had no right to sue in federal court. He declared slaves could be taken anywhere with their owners.