-
Its goal was the restoration of prices paid to farmers for their goods to a level equal in purchasing power to that of 1909–14, which was a period of comparative stability. Although benefit payments to farmers totaled $1.5 billion by 1936, a rise in commodity prices was attributable mainly to severe drought conditions in 1933–36. In spite of its limited achievements, the early AAA program was favored by most farmers. -
Farm income in 1935 was more than 50 percent higher than farm income during 1932, due in part to the farm programs. January 6, 1936, however, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that key provisions of the law were unconstitutional; in particular, the majority of the Court felt that the control of agriculture was a state function not a federal one -
the farm bill has also included re-authorization of funding for food assistance programs. considered the first of the “omnibus” farm bills. It expanded the focus of the farm bill beyond farm supports to other policy areas affecting the agricultural sector. -
Farm bills since 1973 have also been used to make changes to the program. The Food and Agriculture Act of 1977 included the Food Stamp Act of 1977, which permanently amended the Food Stamp Act of 1964 with changes to eligibility requirements. The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 renamed the Food Stamp program to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP. -
The core research and data program of the Economic Research Service covers the breadth of USDA programs affected by the 2018 Farm Act: farming, nutrition, conservation, trade, rural development, research, and energy. ERS will provide highlights and summaries of important new programs and provisions, as well as some economic implications of the new farm legislation based on ERS expertise -
Farm Act increases FY2019-FY2023 spending by $1.8 billion (less than 1 percent) above the level projected for a continuation of the previous farm act. The Congressional Budget Office projects that 76 percent of outlays under the 2018 Farm Act will fund nutrition programs, 9 percent will fund crop insurance programs, 7 percent will fund conservation programs, 7 percent will fund commodity programs, and the remaining 1 percent will fund all other programs