History of Severe Disabilities

  • Jonathon Swift and Daniel Defoe

    Jonathon Swift and Daniel Defoe
    Jonathan Swift and Daniel Defoe were men who began to step forward and advocate for those with disabilities in large ways for their time. Swift, an author, left his fortune from his writings to build homes for the "fools and mad". Defoe began defending those with disabilities by proposing the idea of group homes where a safe place for them to be take care of would be created.
    Link text
  • Jean Marc Gaspard Itard and "The Wild Boy of Aveyron"-Victor

    Jean Marc Gaspard Itard and "The Wild Boy of Aveyron"-Victor
    Victor was found in the woods when he was about 11 years old and had clearly always lived there. Victor was deemed as an “incurable idiot”,but Itard worked with him for many years working on growing his academic, social, and living skills through a variety of learning activities and environments. Victor grew more than anyone thought possible and Itard created a pathway for different ways of educating a child.
    Link Text
  • Jean Etienne Esquirol

    Jean Etienne Esquirol
    This Physician during the 17th century was the first to discover the difference between mental illness and intellectual disability. This is a very monumental moment in special education’s history as there becomes a differentiation between the two, but it also became a hinderance as Esquirol believed that those with intellectual disabilities were unteachable.
    Link Text
  • Edouard Seguin

    Edouard Seguin
    Edouard Seguin was given the opportunity to teach a student with an intellectual disability and decided to take on more students that were in similar situations. This meant that the first school for students with intellectual disabilities began and Seguin wanted to help improve the treatment of these students.
    Link Text
  • Samuel Gridely Howe

    Samuel Gridely Howe
    Samuel Gridley Howe created the first public school for feebleminded children in the U.S.. Howe found himself in the center of the public school reform and pressured Massachusetts to create a public school for the "feebleminded". Due to Howe’s work with children who were deaf and blind and with those with intellectual disabilities, he was able to make a step in the right direction, in America, for special public education.

    Link Text
  • Ward V. Flood

    Ward V. Flood
    Ward V. Flood was taken to the courts for the ability for a principal to refuse acceptance for a student in a school if they did not have the educational abilities to preform at the lowest level of the school.
    Link Text
  • Public Classes Open

    Public Classes Open
    This year a few public classes opened in Boston and Rhode Island for the “feebleminded”.
  • National Education Association

    National Education Association
    This was the year that the National Education Association created a Department of Special Education. The focus was mainly on including children who were deaf, but each decision made strides towards a more inclusion based education system.
    Link Text
  • Elizabeth Farrell and Ungraded Classroom

    Elizabeth Farrell and Ungraded Classroom
    Farrell created a system in the schools where the students are not assessed based in comparison with their peers abilities but rather what that particular student should be learning next. Elizabeth had already implemented this into many schools by 1912, but by then there were 131 classrooms across the United States that was using this model to teach “feebleminded” students.
    Link Text
  • International Council for Exceptional Children

    International Council for Exceptional Children
    Farrell went to teach at Columbia University’s Teachers College and while working there her students and herself created the International Council for Exceptional Children on behalf of advocating for students with disabilities in and outside of the educational system.
    Link Text
  • Parent Movement

    Parent Movement
    During the early 1930s the parent movement began taking off and pushing for more opportunities for their children. Parents became visibly more angry about the situations that their children were being placed in at state institutions and began refusing to send their children there. The parent movement started in the 1930s but took off after the war and parents began banding together to advocate for their children for their rights to free and appropriate public education.
  • National Association of Parents and Friends of Mentally Retarded Children

    National Association of Parents and Friends of Mentally Retarded Children
    This parent group met up and was created in 1950 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. There were representatives from smaller state groups from all over the country, but the parents decided to create this National group to make more Federal progress for their students.
    Link Text
  • P.L. 85-926

    P.L. 85-926
    This was an act created to, “Encourage Expansion of Teaching in the Education of Mentally Retarded Children Through Grants to Institutions of Higher Learning and to State Education Agencies.” This law was to educate more teachers so that more programs could be built for all types of abilities in all types of children.
    Link Text
  • Mills V. Board of Education of the District of Columbia

    Mills V. Board of Education of the District of Columbia
    Parents went to court because students with disabilities were being denied a free and appropriate public education. This court case had many direct effects on the educational improvements that followed.
    Link Text
  • Education for All Handicapped Children Act

    Education for All Handicapped Children Act
    This law is to support states and local communities to meet the needs of children and families with disabilities. It required all public schools to accept federal funds to provide equal education and a free meal.
    Link Text
  • P.L. 95-142

    P.L. 95-142
    Students with disabilities are, by law, required to receive free and appropriate public education.
    Link Text
  • IDEA

    IDEA
    Children with disabilities are to be educated with their non-disabled peers unless the nature of the disability is deemed unsafe for that student or their peers. While the preference is that the student will be educated with their non-disabled peers, alternative places may be appropriate for specific students.
    Link Text