-
PARC argued that The plaintiffs argued that, under Brown, their rights were violated beneath the break even with protection clause and due process clause of the 14th Amendment.
Penn contended that the prohibitions of “retarded children” complained of are based upon four state statutes.
Parc v Penn was milestone ruling that allowed students with special needs to receive free public education and not need special classroom to accommodate these students. (Fitcher,2012)
https://youtu.be/QtFmp3XduaQ -
Individuals with disabilities act or (IDEA) was created to guarantee that students with disabilities were still offered a chance at education. This offered individualization to students with special needs.
-
Rowley guardians asked the school district give Amy with a qualified sign-language mediator in all of her classes, stating that beneath the Idea, such measures were considered “appropriate. Which the board of education thought measures wasn't appropriate. The ruling was said that all students should be offered a program that gave students with disabilities fair opportunity. (Rowley, 2007) https://youtu.be/vIXSW-DYVm8 -
the plaintiff-appellant Timothy W appealed an order from the district court that held that a child that's profoundly disabled isn't eligible for extraordinary instruction if he cannot advantage from such instruction. The court ruled that students with special needs were deemed as high priority. (Sanjay, 2016) -
Americans with disabilities act was to ensure that people with special needs was not discriminated against. This allows students with special needs to be treated just as students with disabilities.