CHAPTER 3: The Collapse of International Peace

  • long term consequences of peace treaties

    -dissatisfied powers (losers, i.e Japan,Italy)
    -germany: versailles punished them severley enough to anger them, but still leave them with considerable resources (potential for recovery=revenge)
    -hitlers foreign policy: abolish ToV, expand Germna territory (lebensraum, unite germans), defeat communism esp. USSR
    -impact on British opinion: saw it as unfair= Hitler's demands seen as understandable
  • Period: to

    The Collapse of International Peace

  • The Saar

    WHAT: -ToV put under control of LoN for 15 years
    -In 1935 the Saar inhabitants vote to return to germany SIGNIFICANCE: -first event on the road to war, since it was a democratic vote led credibility to Nazi claims of uniting germans
    -opportunity for hitler to enact lebensraum and to regain lost territory CONSEQUENCES:- fair vote, didnt contradict to ToV = validated the Nazis
    -Goebbels propaganda campaign = 90% voted to return to Germany
  • Conscription and Rearmament

    WHAT: Hitler began to slowly rearm
    -reintroduced conscription WHY: -Hitler used excuse of other countries failure to disarm, fight great depression SIGNIFICANCE:
    -conscription violated ToV but britain was sympathetic towards these aims. felt a strong GER army was a good buffer against communism in east
    -signed anglo-german naval treaty, allowing GER navy to be up to 35% of ENG. CONSEQUENCES:
    -German military had 95 warships, 1m soldiers and 8,000 aircrafts by 1939
  • Remilitarisation of The Rhineland

    WHAT: -hitler ordered his troops enter rhineland
    -his generals were ordered to retreat if french retaliated. this did not happen
    WHY: -UK believed demands were reasonable
    -france was going through an election, no one wanted to risk sending france to war.
    SIGNIFICANCE:
    -hitler takes first major gamble,saw terms of ToV could be relaxed with UK opinion
    CONSEQUENCES: hitler now knew FRA wouldn't stand against him, if they were not even defending their back yard. saw FRA would not act w out UK.
  • Period: to

    Spanish Civil War

    WHAT:-civil war breaks out between facists and communists
    -Facists win the war due to hitler and mussolini WHY: GER sent aircrafts,army,pilots to help Franco, despite saying they wouldnt SIGNIFCANCE:
    -important test for hitlers new air force/bombs (Guernica)
    -war distracted from his actions elsewhere
    -franco defeats communists = fulfils his foreign policy aims CONSEQUENCES: -mussolini abandoned UK, FRA, formed the Rome-Berlin Axis
  • Anschluss (cont.)

    WHY DID ALLIES ALLOW THIS:
    - Britain and France not sufficiently rearmed, could see that Hitler was stronger (Guernica)
    -Britain viewed Anchluss as fair, reunited germans
    -No Mussolini intervention
  • Anschluss

    WHAT: -failed in 1934 due to Mussolini being allies with austria
    -strictly forbidden under ToV
    -GER and ITA ally in 1937, ITA infroms austrian chancellor, Schussnigg he will no longer defend Austria from attack.
    - in 1938, nazis in austria cause chaos
    -hitler demands a union with Schussnigg to sort out problems
    -Schussnig holds a plebiscite, Hitler sends in troops to "guarantee a trouble free vote"
    -plebiscite gives 99% majority in favor in Anchluss
    -Austria immediately incorporated into GER
  • Sudetenland

    WHAT: -leader of Sudenten Nazis demand unification
    -Hitler threatens Czechs with war if they did not agree to war WHY: -hitler feeling bold due to Anschluss
    -Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia
    -unite german speaking people
    -important area to defend against attacks SIGNIFICANCE:
    -UK and FRA had agreed to defend Czechs
    -high war tensions CONSEQUENCES: Munich Agreement
  • The Munich Agreement

    WHAT: Chamb. meets w Hitler who claimed he only wanted small parts after a plebiscite.Chamb agrees. Hitler increases demands three days later to all of Sudentenland. Mussolini arranges meeting in Munich. UK, FRA & ITA give Hitler Sudetenland.
    WHY: hitler claimed he wanted to reunite german speakers or he'd declare war. Chamb intially refuses and prepares for war
    S:seen as massive betrayal of Czechoslovakia and showed the weakness of UK and FRA
    C: Hitler invades the rest of Czechoslovakia
  • The Invasion of Czechoslovakia

    WHAT: Hitler invades Czechoslovakia in March 1939. Czechs had been severly weakend by POL & HUN taking territory, did not resist. WHY: lebensraum, large coal & iron reserves, wouldn't have to fight war on two fronts. S: first time taking over a non-german speaking country aggressively.Britain and France did not offer resistance, however this was chamberlains final straw. C: UK and FRA issued an ultimatum; if he invaded poland, they would declare war. Hitler did not believe this
  • The Nazi-Soviet Pact

    WHAT: hitler and stalin agreed to a 10-year non-agression. privately they agreed to divide Poland between them. WHY(did stalin sign): no faith w UK and FRA (not consulted over Munich, failed in Spanish Civil War, welcomed rearmament to fight communism. guarantee to poland= UK support of enemies. UK did not take USSR seriously (sent minor officials to meet, unlike GER). S: allows stalin to prepare for war in long term/rearm.huge shock as he was enemies with GER C:invasion of Poland
  • World War II begins

    attacked from east and west, Poland was quickly defeated. to hitler's surprise, the UK and FRA declared war.
  • HOW FAR: Appeasement was Justified

    -Hitler was standing up to communism- a more serious threat
    -lack of US support
    -UK not ready for war
    -Hitler had fair demands, ToV was unreasonable
    -Fragile economy (depression) was a more important priority
    -refusal to repeat horrors of WW1
  • HOW FAR: Appeasement was not justified

    -Encouraged further aggression & gambling
    -Hitler was a liar, repeatedly did not keep his word
    -Early appeasement allowed Germans to grow in strength
    -Proved to Stalin they were untrustworthy allies