Learning knows no bounds

History of Special Education and Inclusive Education Timetoast Timeline

  • 1954: Brown v. Board of education

    1954: Brown v. Board of education

    Brown V Board of Education fought against the segregation of public schools across the nation. Brown V Board of Education made it unconstitutional for race and different backgrounds to be segregated. This did not only apply to public schools but also applied to other public facilities.
    [ Brown V Board of Education] "https://www.britannica.com/event/Brown-v-Board-of-Education-of-Topeka"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX9Dmo24_cc
  • 1965:Elementary & Secondary Education Act

    1965:Elementary & Secondary Education Act

    This law helped low-income families give their children quality education. It provided an opportunity for free and reduced lunches so that all students could eat. Allowed those families to have free public school education for their children. Families from low-income neighborhoods had equal access to quality education
  • 1971 Association of Retarded Children

    1971: Pennsylvania Association of Retarded Children (P A R C) versus Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    overturned Pennsylvania law. Doing this ensured that all children would get a quality education. Not only quality education but allowed the children to get free education. This law cover child with mental retardation and children with any handicap
  • 1972: Mills versus Board of Education

    1972: Mills versus Board of Education

    This was yet another case of children with handicaps not being able to get the education they were entitled to. This required the state to provide alternative educational services for the students. Schools were required to describe their curricula, teacher's qualifications, and the kind of supplemental service they were going to provide to the students.
  • 1973: Vocational Rehabilitation Act

    1973: Vocational Rehabilitation Act

    This act was implemented to stop the discrimination against people with disabilities. This included businesses, schools, etc. It allowed people with disabilities to have rights and stopped others from putting up barriers that made it difficult for them to work.
  • 1982: Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School versus Rowley

    1982: Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School versus Rowley

    Amy Rowley was not getting all of the services she needed as a deaf student. School refused to give her a Sign Language interpreter. After winning their case, this law requires students to receive the maximum services that they need to be successful
  • 1988:   Honig versus Doe

    1988: Honig versus Doe

    This law prohibits schools from expelling students for behaviors that are due to their disability. Even if the student exhibits violent behavior, if it is related to their disability, the state must provide services for that student.
  • 1997 IDEA Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

    1997 IDEA Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

    The IDEA Act requires states to provide free public education to everyone from three to twenty-one. These students are in a regular classroom setting and receive the services needed to succeed. In addition, these services are provided to the students at no cost to the parents.
  • 1999:  Cedar Rapids versus Garret F.

    1999: Cedar Rapids versus Garret F.

    A 4-year-old child had quadriplegia and needed a ventilator because his spine was severed. This law requires that all students receive all necessary services without extra cost to the parents. This required schools to provide a nurse who would care for his medical needs while attending school.
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/Cedar-Rapids-Community-School-District-v-Garret-F
  • 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act

    2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act

    This law includes infants and toddlers that have developmental delays to receive service until 2 years old. Students are titled to an evaluation that does not discriminate against them regardless of race, culture, or language spoken. it allows students to learn in a leas restrictive enviornment.