-
Although these scales were originally designed to identify children with intellectual disabilities in order to place them in an alternative education settings, the idea of numerically quantifying intelligence via test scores forever changed the face of education for ALL students. In today's educational climate, replete with standardized testing and a battery of tests for all "unusual" learners, it's easy to see how Binet and Simon revolutionized their field for better or for worse.
-
Guilford believed that intelligence ratings should look at three different dimensions so as not to alienate or stigmatize divergent thinking. His research paved the way for establishing a broad definition of giftedness and thereby the inclusion of students who are talented in the arts, show aptitude in leadership abilities, etc.
-
The NAGP continues to work today to offer support to parents, educational professionals, and policy makers so that gifted students receive the services they need in order to thrive. Their work is invaluable. The NAGP has published gifted programming standards as well as national gifted education standards for use in teacher preparation programs.
-
The NDEA was mostly meant to introduce science, math, and foreign language initiatives in order to compete with foreign technological advances. However, Title V includes the use of testing to identify gifted and talented students in order to cultivate America's "best and brightest." Since this was the first major federal legislation to recognize gifted students, it stands as an important event in the history of gifted education. It also reinforced the idea of testing for competency.
-
In addition to providing a broad definition of giftedness, the Marland report concluded that gifted students were being deprived of an appropriate education. Although it seems that not much policy has changed since the Marland Report (including federal support), it is an important event in that it documents the general failure of initiatives to adequately service the gifted and talented population up to this point in time.
-
No Child Left Behind marked the continued lack of attention to students who were not "left behind" academically. Although the Act mandated specific interventions for schools nationwide that were not adequately servicing their low or grade-level students, no such legislation was put in place for gifted programs, aside from AYP. Inadvertently, NCLB perpetuated the myth that gifted students would be okay without additional education services.