-
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
Because their daughter Amy was deaf and the interpreter who was assigned to help in class room, felt that Amy did not need his assistance for remainder of the school year, and that she could use a wireless hearing aid and that she was able to read lips. Upon her entrance to the first grade, she provided with a FM hearing aid. The case was brought up to Second Court in which the second court affirmed that judgment in July 1980. And the second court affirmed the judgement in July 1980. -
Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v Rowley
The was the first case based on PL 94-142 to reach the US supreme court; while denying the plaintiffs specific request, the court upheld for each child with disabilities the right to a personalized program of instruction and necessary supportive services.
http://www.britannica.com/topic/Board-of-Education-of-the-Hendrick-Hudson-Central-School-District-v-Rowley -
Irving Independent School District v Tatro
This case involved an 8 year old little girl named Amber Tatro. Who was suffering from spinal bifida. An also speech and orthopedic impairments, as well as having a neurogenic bladder that prevents her from emptying her bladder on her own. This child has to be catheterized every 3 to 4 hours to prevent injury to her kidneys
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/468/883 -
Period: to
Tatro v Board of Education
This case was brought by the parent of Amber Tatro, an 8 year old little girl who suffer from spinal bifida, and suffers from speech and orthopedic impairments, and a neurogenic bladder.
http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.tatro.htm -
Period: to
Courts Ruling
After the schools denial of relief was reversed by the Court of Appeals, the District Court, held that CIC is a related service under the Education of the Handicapped Act,ordered that the a program be modified to include CIC during school.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt -
Period: to
Historical rulings I believe that have helped support the need of students with disabilities
In this case I believe that that this ruling help support the need for students with disabilities, because that is why we have school nurses who are qualified to administer a CIC. -
New York Bd of Education v. Tom F., on Behalf of Gilbert F
This case was filed because Tom the father of Gilbert who was enrolled at a school that specializes in educating children with a learning disability. His father asked the school do an IEP on his child. The school said he had a learning disability, stating that his son would placed be placed in a special education classroom at a new school for the new school year. Tom F. requested a due process hearing to challenge their decision. On April 6, 2001, the courts agreed with Tom. -
Hendrick Hudson v Bd of Education
Summary: This was the first Supreme Court case that set the standards for ( FAPE). This ruling was to provide all children with a disability to access to a public education that meets their needs. I believe that this ruling was justified. These special needs children are entitled to free appropriate public education as well children who do not have a learning. -
New York Bd of Education v. Tom F., on Behalf of Gilbert F
The New York city school district appealed the decision of the U.S District Court. The state review officer found that the parent was entitled to tuition reimbursement, and dismissed the school district's appeal. The school district appealed this decision. On January 3, 2005, the district court overturned the decisions of the review officer. Citing Section 1412(a)(10)(C)(ii) of IDEA 97, there is no authority to reimburse the parent’s any back.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/06-637 -
-
Tom F. v Board of Education
Although the court overturned the decisions of the impartial hearing officer and review officer. Being a parent of a child with learning disability, Tom did everything that was of him, and I would have done the exact same thing. I would have cared about the reimbursement, I would just wanted my child to receive get special education service that he/she are required.