FL v. WUORNOS (1992)

  • 13-FL v. Wuornos: Witness Testimony Spot Coverage Day 4

    More witnesses took the stand to talk about the two women seen by Mallory's car or by investigators and law enforcement, who provided more evidence. All supported the prosecution's case.
  • 16-FL v. Wuornos: James Dallarosa & Jean Immesberger

    Dallarosa was an investigator, while Immesberger was a friend of one of the victims, Peter Seims. Both supported the prosecutor's case.
  • 22-FL v. Wuornos: OPJ: Jacqueline Davis

    Davis was Mallopry's mother, one of the victims. She takes the stand while the jury is not present.
  • 14-FL v. Wuornos: Jimmy Pinner

    Pinner was a lead detective on a separate scene where he discovered the body of one of Wuornoss's other victims, Walter Antonio. He worked with the Dixie County Sheriff's Office. He supported the prosecution's case.
  • 15-FL v. Wuornos: Aileen Berry, Ward Schwob, Margarita Arruza, Rosemary Hill & Bobby Copas

    Berry was the fiancée of one of Wuronos' victims, Troy Burress. Schwob examined some of the bullets from Mallory's crime scene. Arruza helped determine Mallory's cause of death. Hill helped identify some of Wuornoss' fingerprints. Copas was a witness who saw Wuornos by Mallory's car. All five witnesses support the prosecutor's case.
  • 3-FL v. Wuornos: James Downing, James Malady & Jeff Davis

    James Downing was an investigator, James Malady was a detective, and Jeff Davis was a parole officer. James Downing worked with Bonnevier and helped with the reporting process, which led to the investigation. James Malady was a responding officer present when the body of Mallory was discovered. Jeff Davis was the one who documented and took pictures of the crime scene where Mallory's body was found. These three men were on the prosecution side.
  • 5-FL v. Wuornos: Arthur Botting

    Arthur Botting was a forensic pathologist. He collected and preserved evidence at the crime scene where Mallory's body was discovered. He also documented information about the scene, which he discussed. He supported the prosecutor's case.
  • 8-FL v. Wuornos: Lawrence Horzepa

    Lawrence Horzepa was a Volusia County Sheriff's Office investigator. He was one of the lead investigators on the case and provided evidence he obtained through his investigation. He supported the prosecutor's case.
  • 17-FL v. Wuornos: Lawrence Horzepa

    The lead investigator returned to stand to give more evidence about Mallory's crime scene.
  • 18-FL v. Wuornos: OPJ: The Confession Tapes

    Wuornoss's confession tapes are shown to the counsel and judge, jury not present.
  • 19-FL v. Wuornos: Lawrence Horzepa & The Confession Tapes

    Horzepa comes back to stand once more to testify, and the jury is then shown the confession tapes.
  • 21-FL v. Wuornos: Aileen Wuornos PT2

    Wuornos is cross-examined at the stand.
  • 27-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Witness Testimony

    Horzepa, Ahern, and Hanson make another appearance to give testimony on what they witnessed at the crime scene/and at the abandoned vehicle of Mallory.
  • 7-FL v. Wuornos: Tyria Moore

    Tyria Moore was Wuornoss's ex-girlfriend, and she testified against her as a witness. Moore was one of the women a lot of the witnesses saw Wuornos with at Mallory's vehicle. She was not charged with any and even helped with getting Wuronos to confess to the murders.
  • 20-FL v. Wuornos: Aileen Wuornos

    Wuornos takes the stand to give her side of the story.
  • 30-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Jethro Toomer

    Toomer was another forensic psychologist who provided evidence on possible mental and emotional responses made by Wuornos. He worked with the defense to argue against the death penalty.
  • 6-FL v. Wuornos: Ward Schwob, Donald Champagne & Susan Komar

    Ward Schwob and Susan Komar were both crime lab analysts. Donald Champagne was a firearms examiner. All three of these people were witnesses who helped identify Wuornos. Champagne helped link Wuorono's gun to the crime. All three supported the prosecutor's case.
  • 23-FL v. Wuornos: Lawrence Horzepa

    Horzepa returns to share more evidence.
  • 25-FL v. Wuornos: Verdict

    The jury takes 2 hours to decide on a verdict based on the evidence and testimonies given. The jury made the verdict that Wuornos was guilty.
  • 28-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Elizabeth McMahon

    McMahon was a psychologist who provided information about Wuornos' behavior and mental state. She helped defend against the death penalty.
  • 31-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: George Banard

    Banard was a psychiatrist who provided the psychiatric evaluation of Wuornos. He worked with the defense to argue against the death penalty.
  • 32-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Barry Wuornos

    Barry Wuornos was Aileen's brother, who provided information about her background and how she was growing up. He worked with the defense to argue against the death penalty.
  • 33-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: OPJ: Jury Instructions

    The counsel and judge discuss guidelines without the jury being present.
  • 34-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Closing Arguments

    The last closing arguments are made to help the jury decide between a life sentence and the death penalty.
  • 2-FL v. Wuornos: John Bonnevier

    John Bonnevier was a Volusia County Sheriff's Deputy. He shares information about how, when he was on patrol, he discovered an abandoned vehicle, which was Mallory's. When Bonnevier reported the car, he later found that Mallory was listed as missing. This led to an investigation being started. Bonnevier was on the prosecution side.
  • 4-FL v. Wuornos: Daniel Radcliffe, Linda Miller, Jennie Ahern & Carl Clifford

    Daniel Radcliffe was one of the first deputies to appear at the crime scene. Linda Miller was a witness who saw Wuoronos near Mallory's vehicle. Jennie Ahern was another witness who identified Wuronos as one of the women near the car. Carl Clifford was a deputy who helped process Mallory's vehicle and collect evidence from inside it. These four gave testimonies supporting the prosecutors.
  • 9-FL v. Wuornos: OPJ: Williams Rule

    The counsel and judge talk about the evidence and testimony in the case.
  • 10-FL v. Wuornos: Lawrence Horzepa, Tony Cameron & Alan Seabrooks

    Horzepa comes back to the stand to give more information on the case. Cameron testified about evidence collected at the discovery of Mallory's body. Seabrooks helped process Mallory's vehicle. All three men worked with law enforcement.
  • 11-FL v. Wuornos: David Taylor, Ken Jones & Marvin Stevens

    Taylor was a detective who described the discovery of the body. Jones was another detective who processed evidence from Mallory's car. Stevens helped mark evidence at the crime scene. All three men supported the prosecturos case.
  • 12-FL v. Wuornos: John Tilley, Fred Johnson & Donald Champagne

    Tilley was an investigator who helped collect evidence. Johnson was working with CSI and discussed the cause of Mallory's death. Champagne analyzed bullets found at the crime scene. All three men supported the proisecturos case.
  • 24-FL v. Wuornos: Closing Arguments

    The closing arguments of the case are presented. Defense argued that Wuornos committed the murders out of self-defense, and the prosecution provided evidence to say that it was not.
  • 26-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Opening Statements

    The penalty phase begins where opening statements are made. Prosecution and defense provide factors to determine the death penalty or a life sentence.
  • 29-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Harry Krop

    Krop was a forensic psychologist who performed a psychological evaluation on Wuornos. He worked with the defense to argue against the death penalty.
  • 35-FL v. Wuornos Penalty Phase: Verdict & Sentencing

    The jury finds Wuornos guilty of the first-degree murder of Mallory. The judge sentenced Wuronos to death by lethal injection.
  • 1-FL v. Wuornos: Opening Statements

    The opening statements are given first to help people present at the trial understand the evidence and the issues revolving around the case. For this specific case, the opening statements provide background information about Wuornos and the murder she committed, and the reasoning behind it. The prosecution and defense attorneys offer the opening statements. Prosecution argues that the murder was out of financial reasons for gain, while the defense argues that it was self-defense.