-
Board of Education, Hendrick Hudson versus Rowley Board of Ed. of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist., Westchester Cty. v. Rowley. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved March 18, 2019, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1981/80-1002
All schools that accepts federal funds are required to provide a free public education to students. This case is about how a school neglected to provide a student (Amy Rowly) with a sign language interpreter. The case was ruled in amy's favor, however it is up to the school to decide on the steps needed to accommodate handicapped students. This ruling has helped tremendously because it provides equal opportunity for children with disabilities. -
Honig versus Doe Honig v. Doe. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved March 18, 2019, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/86-728
This act is about children who have disabilities are required to remain in school on their education level, unless parents, school or the state agree to remove. John Doe had a disability that caused behavior challenges, the school suspended him and a case was brought about. The ruling was in doe's favor, No students with disabilities are allowed to be suspended for good. -
Winkelman versus Parma
This case is about the school failing to give Jacob Winkelman a free appropriate public education. The court ruled against their favor because they did not have a lawyer, however the IDEA states that parents have to be active and involved in order for schools to placed the child. Eventually the case was rejected and the court ruling was non lawyer parents cannot represent their children.