Screen shot 2017 11 16 at 9.48.37 am

Civil Rights Review

  • Period: to

    Scotts v. Sanford

    Was a slave but they lived in Missouri (banned slavery) after guy died (owner) wanted to buy freedom but wife said no. He was living in a free state but he was a slave.He was seen as property.(all slaves were seen as property).
  • Period: to

    Reconstruction & Reconstruction Amendments

    The 13th, 14th, 15th, 19th, and the 24th
    This started helping the country get rid of slavery.
  • Period: to

    Jim Crow Era

    Laws that were set to make it harder for African Americans to vote aka Grandfather Clause, Literacy Tests, and Poll Taxes.
  • Plessy v. Ferguson

    Plessy v. Ferguson
    The African American man sat in the white section on a train and they told hime to go to his section. He said that this was violating his equal protection rights. He took it to court and the court said that they were separate but equal. That is when the courts set the doctrine "Separate but Equal".
  • The 19th Amendment

    The 19th Amendment
    It allowed women the right to vote.
  • Period: to

    Scottsboro Boys

    They were accused of raping two women when they were innocent. They were stripped of some of their due process rights.
  • The George Stinney Case

    The George Stinney Case
    A 14 year old boy who was executed for the murder of two little girls but he was innocent.
  • Brown V. Board

    Brown V. Board
    There were two schools a black school and a white school and they were separate but equal. Then the courts looked at the kids and it showed that the kids who go to the black school feel inferior to the white kids. The courts ruled that unconstitutional and stopped school segregation.
  • Civil Rights Act of 1964

    Civil Rights Act of 1964
    Outlawed discrimination between gender, race, or religion
  • Voting Rights Act of 1965

    Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Got rid of laws that made it harder to stop others from voting.
  • Civil Rights Act of 1968

    Civil Rights Act of 1968
    Prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin and sex.
  • California V. Bakke

    California V. Bakke
    The Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.