-
Board of Education of the Henrick Hudson School System v. Rowley
The Supreme Court decision declared that appropriate education was intended for all students with disabilities in all public schools under the P.L. 94-142 . An appropriate education was reaffirmed by the Court. Children were allowed to learn at their full potential alongside other students. (Henley, Ramsey, Algozzine. 2009). -
Honig v. Doe
The Supreme Court said that schools cannot excluded children because of their disruptive behavior in the classroom, there are interventions that should be in place to control the behaviors and have some plan in place to redirect their behavior. Children cannot e excluded form school because they may cause safety hazards, it's against the law to excluded children with disabilities from school, because of their behavior and being disruptive in the classroom. (www.wrightslaw.com/law). -
Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education
District and appeals courts upheld the hearing of children that were excluded from school because they were retarded and it is against the law to tell children that they can not be educated with nondisabled children.
The laws govern by IDEA all children have the right to be educated with other children. Children should be educated in a regular classroom there should be a plan in place that would allow for appropriate education. (www.cesa7.org).