-
A landmark case that happened during the civil rights movement in which the Supreme Court ruled that segregation based on race in schools was denying minorities of equal education. Advocates later used this case as an example to argue that they should not segregate students with disabilities and deny the students from their educational rights.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTGHLdr-iak -
The Supreme Court ruled that the state of Illinois did not have to provide free public education to students with disabilities since they are “feeble-minded” and claimed that the children who were “mentally deficient” were limited and would be unable to achieve and appreciate the benefit of a good education. -
This was the federal government’s way of accommodating and ensuring that students from disadvantaged backgrounds have equal access to the public education system. An example of this was providing students with free and reduced lunch to have the student’s basic needs met. ESEA for Individuals with disabilities was a grant program that encouraged states to create and improve programs for disabilities. -
PARC sued the state over the law that discriminated against and denied free education to mentally retarded children. The state was not allowed to “deny to any mentally retarded child access to a free public program of education and training” The result allowed all children including the mentally retarded to have a free education. -
This case argued that handicapped children were not to be excluded from public schools similar to the PARC case that fought for all students to have a free and public education. In both cases, the state was required to describe the objectives, curriculum, teacher qualifications, and supplemental services. -
Amy Rowley was a deaf fifth grader who used an FM hearing aid but unfortunately, her school failed to provide her with an interpreter, her parents then filed a suit claiming a violation of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. The court ruled that P.L 94-142 required states provide” sufficient, but not the best possible, support for students to benefit from public education at a level typical of that of nondisabled peers” -
This is a case that ensures that individuals with emotional and or behavioral disorders will not be expelled for behaviors related to their disabilities even when they have academic and social problems. This case was initiated by a student named John Doe who struggled in controlling his impulses and got into an altercation with another student who was bullying him. Doe was then suspended and after unsuccessfully arguing against the school he took action against the school with this case. -
After an accident at the age of 4 Garret F. was paralyzed from the neck down in spite of that his mental capacities were unaffected. He required assistance from a nurse in order to attend his regular classes. The court ruled that under IDEA that all students must be provided with the services they need to attend school at no extra cost to the parents -
A civil suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in which Jeff and Sandee Winkelmans argued that their son Jacob failed to receive "free appropriate public education" in Parma city school. The supreme court declared that parents may pursue IDEA claims on their behalf independent of their child’s rights and that IDEA protects the rights of the child and not their parents. -
ESSA was signed by President Obama as an act to replace and update the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). This was intended to provide equal opportunities for all students. ESSA focuses on local and state control rather than the previous federal government in order to better focus on the needs of the child.
https://www.ed.gov/essa?src=rn