Af44c395 afef 43d2 adc8 ebbbbfbdd76b 900 900

Process of Incorporation

  • Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad Company v. City of Chicago

    Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad Company v. City of Chicago

    The City of Chicago wanted to connect two disjoint sections of Rockwell Street between 18th and 19th Streets, over private property. Did not provide proper compensation, which led to a violation of the 5th amendment.
  • Gitlow v. New York

    Gitlow v. New York

    Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist leader, was convicted under New York’s criminal anarchy law for publishing 16,000 copies of the Left-Wing Manifesto, which advocated “the proletariat revolution and the Communist reconstruction of society” through strikes and “revolutionary mass action.” The Supreme Court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are "fundamental personal rights" In which prosecuting him for this would violate his 1st amendment right.
  • Near v. Minnesota

    Near v. Minnesota

    A Minnesota law that imposed permanent injunctions against the publication of newspapers with "malicious, scandalous, and defamatory" content violated the First Amendment, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth.
  • DeJonge v. Oregon

    DeJonge v. Oregon

    The Court overturned the conviction of Dirk DeJonge, who had been prosecuted under Oregon's criminal syndicalism law for helping to conduct a meeting in Portland organized by the Communist party to protest police shootings of striking longshoremen and raids on workers’ homes and hall.The Oregon Supreme Court held that a person could be convicted under the statute for doing nothing more than participating in a wholly innocent meeting called by the party.
  • Cantwell v. Connecticut

    Cantwell v. Connecticut

    Newton Cantwell and his sons, Jehovah's Witnesses, were proselytizing a predominantly Catholic neighborhood in Connecticut. They were travelling door-to-door and approaching people on the street. Two pedestrians reacted angrily to an anti-Catholic message. Cantwell and his sons were arrested and charged with: (1) violation of a Connecticut statute requiring solicitors to obtain a certificate before soliciting funds from the public, and (2) inciting a common-law breach of the peace.
  • Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing

    Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing

    was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that applied the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to state law,Supreme Court upheld a law that allowed for parochial school students to be bused. Students at church schools were riding public school buses.
  • In re Oliver

    In re Oliver

    was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the right of due process in state court proceedings,Open fields cannot support a reasonable expectation of privacy and are thus not protected by the Fourth Amendment.
  • Mapp v. Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio

    A case in which the Court decided that evidence obtained illegally may not be used against someone in a court of law by the Fourth Amendment.
  • robinson v. california

    robinson v. california

    Is the first landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution was interpreted to prohibit criminalization of particular acts or conduct, as contrasted with prohibiting the use of a particular form of punishment for a crime.It is unconstitutional for a state to punish a defendant for drug addiction, which is a status rather than an act, when the defendant has not engaged in any illegal conduct involving drugs in the state.
  • Gideon v. Wainwright

    Gideon v. Wainwright

    was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own.Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law. At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney. In open court, he asked the judge to appoint counsel for him because he could not afford an attorney
  • Edwards v. South Carolina

    Edwards v. South Carolina

    was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government officials to force a crowd to disperse when they are otherwise legally marching in front of a state house.
  • Ker v. California

    Ker v. California

    was a case before the United States Supreme Court, which incorporated the Fourth Amendment's protections against illegal search and seizure. The case was decided on June 10, 1963, by a vote of 5–4.
  • Malloy v. Hogan

    Malloy v. Hogan

    was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States deemed defendants' Fifth Amendment privilege not to be compelled to be witnesses against themselves was applicable within state courts as well as federal courts, overruling the decision in Twining v. New Jersey
  • Pointer v. Texas

    Pointer v. Texas

    was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the right of to confront accusers in state court proceedings.
  • klopfer v. north carolina

    klopfer v. north carolina

    was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the Speedy Trial Clause of the United States Constitution in state court proceedings.
  • Washington v. Texas

    Washington v. Texas

    the Court decided that the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution is applicable in state courts as well as federal courts The right to offer the testimony of witnesses, and to compel their attendance, if necessary, is in plain terms the right to present a defense, the right to present the defendant's version of the facts as well as the prosecution's to the jury so it may decide where the truth lies. This right is a fundamental element of due process of law.
  • Duncan v. Louisiana

    Duncan v. Louisiana

    Gary Duncan, a black teenager in Louisiana, was found guilty of assaulting a white youth by allegedly slapping him on the elbow. Duncan was sentenced to 60 days in prison and fined $150. Duncan's request for a jury trial was denied.the states were obligated under the Fourteenth Amendment to provide such trials. Petty crimes, defined as those punishable by no more than six months in prison and a $500 fine, were not subject to the jury trial provision.
  • Benton v. Maryland

    Benton v. Maryland

    a Supreme Court of the United States decision concerning double jeopardy. Benton ruled that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment applies to the states. In doing so, Benton expressly overruled Palko v. Connecticut.
  • Schilb v. Kuebel

    Schilb v. Kuebel

    In order to gain his liberty pending trial,and in accord with the Illinois bail statutes hereinafter described, deposited $75 in cash with the clerk of the court. This amount was 10% of the aggregate bail fixed on the two charges $500 on the first and $250 on the second. that its imposition on an accused found innocent constitutes a court cost against the nonguilty. The trial court dismissed Schilb's complaint, and the State Supreme Court affirmed.
  • Rabe v. Washington

    Rabe v. Washington

    was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of obscenity laws and criminal procedure to the states. a police officer viewed the film Carmen Baby, which included sexually frank scenes
  • Argersinger v. Hamlin

    Argersinger v. Hamlin

    Supreme Court decision holding that the accused cannot be subjected to actual imprisonment unless provided with counsel. charged with carrying a concealed weapon, a misdemeanor in the State of Florida. The charge carried with it a maximum penalty of six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. During the bench trial in which he was convicted and sentenced to serve ninety days in jail, Argersinger was not represented by an attorney.
  • McDonald v. Chicago

    McDonald v. Chicago

    Several suits were filed against Chicago and Oak Park in Illinois challenging their gun bans after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller. In that case, the Supreme Court held that a District of Columbia handgun ban violated the Second Amendment.
  • Timbs v. Indiana

    Timbs v. Indiana

    The state charged Timbs with two charges of felony dealing and one charge of conspiracy to commit theft. He later pleaded guilty to one charge of felony dealing and one charge of conspiracy to commit theft in exchange for the state dismissing the remaining charge. After accepting the plea, the trial court sentenced Timbs to six years, five of which were to be suspended. Timbs also agreed to pay fees and costs totaling approximately $1200.