-
Motivated NY legislators to pass the FIRST privacy statute
-
The court determined that Sidis was still newsworthy after many years and had little or no claim to privacy
-
*KEY case: USSC applied NYT v Sullivan actual malice standard to the false-light privacy tort
-
An NY court ruled that the newsworthiness of an event may override a claim of appropriation- the poster presented political commentary on a mock presidential campaign
-
A Missouri court declared that the newsworthiness of an event outweighed any privacy conerns in fast breaking events
-
A federal district court ruled that RD had reported the info accurately and Briscoe was still newsworthy
-
1972-1982
A federal district court ruled that overzealous members of the media can be restrained and must be respectful of moments of private intimacy -
USSC declared that falsifying quotes constitutes actual malice and fictionalization
-
FL court determined that the doctrine of custom and usage protected the media because fire authorities had invited them onto the property
-
USSC ruled that the media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations
-
An NY court ruled that the newsworthiness of an event does not necessarily outweigh the rights of a private company to conduct business uninterrupted
-
A federal district court ruled that a hunter shooting birds on the ground is highly offensive to the average person in western Pennsylvania
-
A CA court ruled that the media had not "incited" the harmful action
-
A GA court ruled Walt Disney could not be sued for emotional distress
-
A Missouri court ruled that a newspaper and the city could be sued for emotional distress
-
An appellate judge ruled that the newsworthiness of the situation outweighed any privacy claim
-
An NY court ruled that a magazine must secure permission to use a celebrity's name in an endorsement
-
A federal district court ruled that in situations where a person is "known" by a name or slogan, there is a need to secure permission before engaging in a commercial transaction
-
An NY court declared that a signed model release is a very strong defense regardless of the time element- a parent's consent is BINDING for a minor
-
A CA appellate court ruled that the newsworthiness of the event outweighed Sipple's privacy claims
-
USSC held that a person cannot sue for emotional distress when there has been no invasion of privacy or defamation
-
A CA court ruled that "sound-alikes" need to be legally cleared before undergoing a commercial venture
-
A court held the magazine liable for the harmful effect of the ad. Court ruled that the ad had subjected the public to a "clearly identifiable, reasonable risk of harm."
-
Ruling: Media ride-alongs violate the 4th Amendment
The marshals were given immunity because this principle of law was not established at the time of this ride-along. -
USSC ruled for Vopper; ruled that the information was obtained legally and was of public concern