Untitled

Influential Landmark Cases specific to 21st Century Special Education

By Zulma Colon
  • Board of Ed.of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist. v Rowley 458 U.S.176 (1982)

    Board of Ed.of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist. v Rowley 458 U.S.176 (1982)

    Free appropriate public education for students with disabilities.
  • Period: to

    Board of Ed. of Hendrick Central School Dist. v. Rowley 458 U.S. 176 (1982)

    Under the EHA, the state governments, around local school boards, was required to provide services and open the doors to all physically challenged students. Free appropriate education FASE om the least restrictive environment .
    http://www.slideshare.net/casandoval1/hendrick-hudson-sd-v-rowley-1982
  • Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305 (1988)

    Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305 (1988)

    In this case the states required to provide free and appropriate education for children with disabilities.
  • Period: to

    Honing v. Doe, 484. 305 (1988)

    In this cases the state requires to provide free and appropriate public education for children with disabilities. Student with disabilities cannot be suspended from the classroom from dangerous or disruptive behavior. Any disrupted behavior parents need to be included in the decision and process that being made for their children.http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.honig.doe.htm
  • Period: to

    Winkelman v. Parma City School District (No.05-983) (2007)

    The State Court rules that parents have the rights to represent their children when it comes to he/she specials needs concerns.
  • Winkelman v. Parma City School District (No.05-983) (2007)

    Winkelman v. Parma City School District (No.05-983) (2007)

    In this case the school district failed to provide their disable son free appropriate public education as required by the ACT of IDEA. http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.winkelman.parma.htm