Framing

  • Markowitz’s Utility Theory (Markowitz, 1952)

  • Prospect Theory / (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

  • The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice

    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. Cit: 17.111
  • Neural network models

    (Grossberg & Gutowski, 1987)
  • Choice and culture: The behavioral basis of cultural impact on transactions

    Lindenberg, S. (1989). Choice and culture: The behavioral basis of cultural impact on transactions. Social Structure and Culture, Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.
  • Venture Theory

    (Hogarth & Einhorn, 1990)
  • Positive-negative asymmetry

    (Peeters & Czapinski, 1990)
  • Fuzzy-trace theory

    (Reyna & Brainerd, 1991)
  • Probabilistic mental model theory

    (Gigerenzer et al., 1991)
  • Catastrophe theory

    (Svyantek et al., 1991)
  • Cumulative Prospect Theory

    (Tversky & Kahneman, 1992)
  • The Advantage Model

    (Shafir et al., 1993)
  • Framing, empirical evidence, and applications

    Lindenberg, S. (1993). Framing, empirical evidence, and applications. Jahrbuch für neue politische Oekonomie, 12, 11-38
  • Alternatives, frames, and relative prices: A broader view of rational choice theory

    Lindenberg, S., & Frey, B. S. (1993). Alternatives, frames, and relative prices: A broader view of rational choice theory. Acta sociologica, 36(3), 191-205.
  • Self-discrepancy theory

    (Higgins, 1987; Tykocinskl et al., 1994)
  • Elaboration theory

    (Maule, 1995; 1989)
  • Security-potential/ aspiration theory

    (Maule, 1995; Schneider, 1992)
  • Behavioural models

    (March, 1996; Rachlin et al., 1986)
  • All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects

    Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76(2), 149-188. Cit: 2064
  • Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior.

    Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social issues, 63(1), 117-137. Cit: 627
  • Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior

    Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2013). Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior. Encouraging sustainable behavior, 37-54.
  • Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behaviour: the dynamics of overarching goals

    Steg, L., Lindenberg, S., & Keizer, K. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behaviour: the dynamics of overarching goals. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 179-207.
  • Moral hypocrisy and the hedonic shift: A goal-framing approach

    Lindenberg, S., Steg, L., Milovanovic, M., & Schipper, A. (2018). Moral hypocrisy and the hedonic shift: A goal-framing approach. Rationality and Society, 30(4), 393-419.