-
Ruled that segregation within public schools was illegal. This case determined "separate but equal."
-
P.A.R.C v Pennsylvania argued that the exclusions of "retarded children" complained of are based upon four state statutes.
-
Further elaborated on what is deemed appropriate under FAPE. Amy Rowley advanced with disabilities better than a typical child in a mainstream classroom.
-
U.S. Supreme Court dealt with the issue of expelling disabled child based on actions arising out of that child's disability.
Court ruled that a school district may not unilaterally exclude or expel a disabled child from the classroom setting for dangerous or disruptive conduct from their disability. -
Timothy W appealed an order from the district court that held that a child is profoundly handicapped is not eligible for special education if he cannot benefit from such education.
-
Mandates state-sponsored separate and nonintegrated living arrangements may be discriminatory towards people with disabilities.
-
endorse means under the IDEA and ADA for individuals and their families to remedy alleged educational discrimination in public schools. The use of a service animal as a program modification to enable full and equal enjoyment of educational services.