-
This Tariff imposed high taxes on imports, which angered Southern states like South Carolina because they relied on foreign trade. The tariffs served to protect industrys. -
John C. Calhoun "anonymously" published this document, stating and arguing that states could Noneify federal laws were deemed unconstitutional. He warned the readers that continuing tariffs could lead to federal succession. -
A debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina. Hayne, representing South Carolina, argued that the federal Constitution was an arrangement among the states, allowing any state to Noneify a federal law it deemed unconstitutional. This was part of a states' rights argument that had roots in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, which posited that states could declare federal acts void within their jurisdictions. -
Reduced taxes implied to (Tariff of 1828), but still failed to resolve dibutes with South Carolina, leading to increased tensions. -
South Carolina declared the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within the states, South Carolina threatened to "secede" from the Union, if the federal government tried to enforce the tariffs. -
This proclamation asserted federal supremacy warning that attempting and or trying to secede by armed forces was treason. He emphasized the protection of the Union. -
Congress passed this bill giving authorization to use military force to enforce the tariffs of 1828 and 1832. -
Designed by Henry Clay, this tariff gradually reduced taxes, which in return eased tensions and lead to South Carolina to repeal its Noneification ordinance. -
South Carolina threatend to secede from the Union in response Tariff 1828, they seen it unjust and unconstitutional and the states should have the power to void cetain tariffs.