Ian mulcahey f020212

Ian Mulcahey

By maddi_mooney
  • Period: to

    Ian Mulcahey

  • CABE and residents slam Gensler's Thames river park

    CABE and residents slam Gensler's Thames river park
    <a href='http://bit.ly/r0DhGa' target="_blank">Architects Journal - CABE and residents slam Gensler's Thames river park</a> “CABE’s letter is based upon the panel review which was drafted before the application was submitted. It is clear from their comments that even though the panel chair undertook a subsequent desk review the panel haven’t reviewed the full application submission, which is unfortunate."

  • London doesn’t need a floating park on the Thames, but would it benefit from one?

    London doesn’t need a floating park on the Thames, but would it benefit from one?
    <a href='http://bit.ly/uJkFHt' target="_blank">Gensler on Cities - London doesn’t need a floating park on the Thames, but would it benefit from one?</a> Ian Mulcahey writes article for GenslerOn cities in response to oppositions to the scheme in October 2011.