Images

Courts and Public Purse Strings: Have Portraits of Budgeting Missed Something?

By lsgilmore
  • Holt vs. Sarver

    Holt vs. Sarver

    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit First state to have prison system involation of the 8th Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment. This affect edspending. Litigation has increased spending.
  • Wyatt v. Alabama Mental Health Board

    Wyatt v. Alabama Mental Health Board

    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Permitted the state to qualify for medicare and medicade funds which eased the financial impact of the judgement.
  • Bradley v. Milliken

    Bradley v. Milliken

    United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit The judge urged state government to seek federal funds to implement and satisfy their decision.
  • NY Assoc, of Retarded Children v State of New York

    NY Assoc, of Retarded Children v State of New York

    United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit The decision resulted in a great budgetary impact due to a consent decree that included "deinstitutionalization" of patients, better staff to client ratios, and improved services for the improved population.
  • Chapman v. Rhoades

    Chapman v. Rhoades

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit The director of the correctional facility did not comply with the decision due to difficulty increasing the operating budget and creating a capital budget construction program.
  • US v. City of Parma, Ohio

    US v. City of Parma, Ohio

    United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit The judge urged state government to seek federal funds to implement and satisfy their decision.