-
-
Rahsia had agreed to manufacture and supply gloves to Cresnett in consideration of the prices quoted in the respective proforma inovoices.
Cresnett contends that the prices quoted in the proforma invoices were based on the raw material price prevailing at the time of the issuance of the production of proforma invoices and the estimated production lead time.
Cresnett sought to place reliance on the proforma invoices for their full terms and effects during the hearing -
because of higher production cost
-
Cresnett asserted that notwithstanding Cresnett's insistance that Rahsia wasn't entitled to effect such icrease
Rahsia refused to continue with the agreements based on the prices quoted in the proforma invoices
Rahsia send a reply letter issued immediately after the said telecommunication wrote that a review had been made and any notification to that effect had been communicated to Cresnett by various letters and email (but Cresnett ever having received any) -
from 37.200 to 41.250
-
from 72,395.20 to 81,116
-
that absence must very latest one month before shipment, due to that Rahsia obliged to still supply based o the prices quoted in the proforma invoices
-
from 34,552.40 to 38,475.30
-
from 72,518 to 80,773
-
from 65,800 to 74,050
-
from 35,725 to 37,600
-
from 79,315 to 82,415
-
also a warning had been made known to her on the weather forecast that delays should be expected due to high incidence of turbulance across the continent.
Due to that, Cresnett was compelled to source out other manufacturers on short notice to fulfil Cresnett's contract -
from 37,100 to 42,875
-
-
The mayor of london said in his statement which had global reach, expressed concern over the incident and promised that order shall be restored in due course