-
During this time there was racial segregation. Segregation deprived many students of obtaining equal education opportunities. "separate but equal was used to allow students with disabilities to be allowed in the same public schools, and all students could get an equal education.
-
The issue here was in regards to class placement. Diana argued that students should be tested on their native language and English and go off cultured related tests. Verbal items were revised to reflect the student's culture. Also, group administered test could not be used to place students in class programs meant for intellectual disabilities.https://www.slideshare.net/casandoval1/diana-v-state-board-of-education-1970
-
The right for education was given to DIsabled children to be able to obtain free education through the day of 6-21, regardless of disabilities.
https://www.rootedinrights.org/15321-revision-v1/ -
States had a rule that after 180 days they wouldn't pay for the education of students with disabilities. The court stated that they should have access to a year-round education so they don't lose the progress they've made.
https://prezi.com/yalia0sbsgfa/armstrong-vs-kline/ -
Rowley's parents had requested an interpreter for their deaf son. The school denied the interpreter because Rowley was receiving equal education for him. The court denied the suit by the parents.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Board-of-Education-of-the-Hendrick-Hudson-Central-School-District-v-Rowley -
The school officials stated that he wasn't benefiting at all from a traditional environment. Daniels parents took the case to the court stating that not all students should be in a traditional classroom and agreed to move Daniel to a full-time special classroom. As stated first the student must show progress in a traditional classroom.
-
Special ed instructors can now provide services at parochial schools.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Agostini-v-Felton -
The court ruled that the parents should show proof of what they are arguing. The parents must present in court why the education program is not for their child.
http://www.wrightslaw.com/news/05/schaffer.weast.htm -
Parents argued if they should be reimbursed for the charges of the people representing their case. The court decided it was at their expense as it states in (IDEA)
(Recovery of fees) -
The supreme court gave the right to parents to represent the children with disabilities in court cases. http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.winkelman.parma.htm
