History of Character Education

  • John Locke

    John Locke
    Learning was secondary to virtue and was necessary but not the major​ role of education (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • 18th Century Educators

    Educators associated moral education with the ultimate success of the new democracy (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • 18th Century Parents

    Parents highly valued character. They expected the schools to make the children smart and good persons (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • Colonial America

    Common schools existed for moral purpose and were to instruct in moral sensibility and good habits for the good of the new democracy (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009)
    Moral education was based on a reflexive Protestant theology (Nucci, Narvaez, & Krettenauer, 2014).
  • Schools

    Schools were established equally for moral and social reasons as well as academic studies (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
    Schools focused on teaching students to be good citizens and to have good character (Sojourner, 2012).
  • 19th Century Educators

    Educators relied heavily on discipline while being models of good character and the adopted curriculum to instruct students the various virtues (Sojourner, 2012).
  • Character Education

    Character education was mainly taught using the Bible which provided the instruction of moral and religious studies (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • John Stuart Mill

    John Stuart Mill
    Strong believer that character development would solve the problems of society (Huitt, 2004).
  • John Dewey

    John Dewey
    The mission of the school should be grounded in moral education (Huitt, 2004).
  • Logical Positivism

    A major philosophical influence that played a large role in the restructuring of character education in the 20th century. It asserted that there is a distinct correlation between facts and values (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • Hugh Hartshore and Mark May

    Reported on the research called Character Education Inquiry. It focused on character development. Research concluded that there wasn't anything found that could be called character in the study. Everyone acts according to their own moral principle within a given situation (Nucci, Narvaez, & Krettenauer, 2014).
  • Harry McKown

    Wrote Character Education book that defined what character education is and why school should teach it. Also he identified objectives of a program and how it should appear in school curriculum as well as having it as an extra curricular activity. He outlined how it should be taught in the homes and communities and how it should be assessed in the youth (Nucci, Narvaez, & Krettenauer, 2014).
  • Character Education

    By the middle of the 20th century, confidence was beginning to erode in character education and faced a decline in schools. Educators began to shift their priorities to academic studies rather than the teachings of moral education (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • Jean Piaget, Lawrence Kohlberg, Erik Erikson

    American psychologists that viewed moral education through a cognitive approach. They believed that it was compatible with liberal traditions of critical thinking instead of virtue based (Nucci, Narvaez, & Krettenauer, 2014).
  • Lawrence Kohlberg

    Lawrence Kohlberg
    Considered the most influential of developmental theorists. He focused a person's character development from a cognitive structural perspective (Nucci, Narvaez, & Krettenauer, 2014). He believed in educating students through value awareness and self esteem lessons and not through stories in textbooks (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • Values Clarification Approach

    Highly criticized for creating classrooms that were free of values. It relied on students developing their own reasoning processes which was based on their moral judgement. This approach moved the educators from the center of authority to the new pluralistic view that society held eliminating a set of common values (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • 1960's Educators

    The late 1960's saw a the replacement of traditional character education shifting to the teachers now assisting students in clarifying their own values (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • 1970's Character Education

    During the 1970's a reemergence of character education occurred. Two dominant forces were the1960's approach of value clarification and moral dilemmas which shaped the education of the 70's (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009). Kohlberg continued to argue that "the goal of moral education should be to foster students‘ development through natural stages of moral reasoning" (Sojourner, 2012).
  • 1980's School's Role

    During the 1980's, character education was returned to the schools and by the end of the decade, the schools returned to the traditional character development models and had educators focusing on the student's everyday behaviors as opposed to their moral reasoning abilities (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).
  • Thomas Lickona

    Thomas Lickona
    Noted that the 1990's were the beginning of a new era of character education that restores one's good character to its rightful place as the central outcome of the school's moral enterprising efforts (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009). He also was an advocate for national awareness of the need of a comprehensive school wide character education program (Sojourner, 2012).
  • Character Counts!

    Created by a coalition which was committed to promoting ―six pillars of character- trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, and citizenship in schools and communities (Sojourner, 2012).
  • Character Education Partnership

    In 1993, the Character Education Partnership (CEP) was established as a nonprofit, nonpartisan national coalition committed to putting character development at the top of the nation‘s education agenda (Sojourner, 2012).
  • 21st Century Character Education

    In most recent years, there is a variety of character education programs for our youth. Such as:
    JROTC-sponsored by the military that helps build character and morals in high school students.
    Social and Emotional Learning (SEL)-students learn to recognize and manage their emotions.
    Service Learning-helps students develop critical thinking about moral and ethical questions (Tatman, Edmonson, & Slate, 2009).