051616 1stamendment 1

First Amendment Activity

  • Eastern Railroad Presidnts Conference V. Noerr Motor Freight Inc.

    Eastern Railroad Presidnts Conference V. Noerr Motor Freight Inc.
    A trucking companie and their trading association sued the Clayton Act for treble damages and injunctive relief against a group of railroads. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/365/127/
  • Period: to

    1st Amendment Court Cases:

    Mr.Schooley's Business Law Class. 2nd Hour
  • New York Times V. Sullivan

    New York Times V. Sullivan
    United States Supreme Court case that established actual malice standard. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/254/case.html
  • United Mine Workrs of America V. Penington.

    United Mine Workrs of America V. Penington.
    An agreement between union and the large operators to secure uniform labor standards throughout the industry would not be exempt from the antitrust laws. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/381/657/
  • Calionia Motor Tansport Co. V. Trucking Unlimited.

    Calionia Motor Tansport Co. V. Trucking Unlimited.
    Highway carriers filed this civil action of the Clayton Act for relief and damages against petitioner highway carriers charging that petitioners conspired to monopolize the transportation of goods. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/404/508
  • Getz V. Robert Welch, Inc.

    Getz V. Robert Welch, Inc.
    The Nelson family retained Elmer Gertz, to represent them in a civil action against Nuccio. Robert Welch, Inc. The magazine ran a story about the Nuccio trial where it accused Gertz of being a Communist and participating in the Communist campaign against local police. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/323/case.html
  • NAACP V. Claiborne Hardware Co.

    NAACP V. Claiborne Hardware Co.
    Iin 1966, The Mississippi National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) began to boycott the businesses of several white merchants, on the basis of racial injustice. The Respondents, and others, brought suit asking for damages, alleging that their businesses had suffered due to the boycott. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/458/886/case.html
  • Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. V. NLRB.

    Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. V. NLRB.
    A waitress at petitioner's restaurant, filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board, saying she had been fired because of her efforts to organize a union, Helton and other waitresses, picketed the restaurant and distributed leaflets. \https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/461/731
  • City of Columbia V. Omni Outdoor Advertising Inc.

    City of Columbia V. Omni Outdoor Advertising Inc.
    After Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. entered the billboard market in petitioner Columbia, South Carolina, petitioner Columbia outdoor Advertising, Inc. lobbied these of ficials to enact zoning ordinances restricting billboard construction. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/365/
  • Pofessional Real Estate Investors V. Colubia Pictures Inc.

    Pofessional Real Estate Investors V. Colubia Pictures Inc.
    On May 03, 1993, the Supreme Court issued a 9-0 decision, stating that the case of Professional Real Estate Investors Inc. should be affirmed and upholding the law in question as constitutional. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/508/49/
  • Madsen V. Women's Health Center.

    Madsen V. Women's Health Center.
    Madsen was one of a group of anti-abortion protesters of Florida against picketing within a certain distance of the Women's Health Center Inc. The protesters petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/512/753/case.html
  • Mclntyre V. Ohio Elections Comm'n.

    Mclntyre V. Ohio Elections Comm'n.
    Margaret McIntyre distributed anonymous political information at several public meetings. She was reported in violation of Ohio Elections Law, which required her to sign the leaflets. She appealed on the basis that the law suppressed political speech. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/514/334/case.html
  • Schenck V. Pro-Choice Network of Westrn New York.

    Schenck V. Pro-Choice Network of Westrn New York.
    Upstate New York abortion doctors and clinics and an organization dedicated to maintaining access to abortion services, filed a complaint seeking to enjoin petitioners, other individuals, and three organizations from engaging in blockades and other illegal conduct at the clinics. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/519/357/case.pdf