-
Cedar Rapid v Garrett VIDEO
-
Honig v Doe
This case argue on behave of handicap children with an IEP that has been expelled indefinitely from school. The parents argue that the “Stay Put” provision should protect the children from being expelled. The ruling 6-2. The court believes that this violate the “Education for all Handicap Children Act, because the expulsion is related to the child’s Handicap. This support the child by giving a chance to cool down and return to school to get the “Free Education that is provided through the IDEA. -
Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. Garret F.
This case was argue on behave of a disability student name Garrett. He argue that the school should provide funding for one-on-one nursing under the IDEA act. the court decision was yes 7-2 because it allows the child to stay in school and able to access to a free education. This decision support children with disability by allowing them receive all benefit from special Education. Disability children now can get their physical needs met and education at the same time. -
Honig v Doe ARTICLE
-
Winkelman v. Parma City School VIDEO
-
Winkelman v, Parma City School Districts
This case was presented to the court on behave of the children with disability. The parents argue that they could represent the child in court without having a Lawyer representing them. This support the children because it ensure that children with disability have a voice to be heard in court. The court ruled in favor of the parents. the court believe that the parents speak on behave of the IDEA on their on.
