Research process 175x175

Bill Soden Thesis Timeline

  • Initial research proposal

    Initial research proposal
    My first proposal was rather general, focusing on comparing development of writing in two disciplines.
  • Phase 1: Recruiting participants

    Presentation to Archaeology masters students, outlining research and inviting participants to take part.
  • Phase 1: Baseline interviews

    Phase 1: Baseline interviews
    Baseline interviews carried out with three student participants and three tutors in Archaeology.
  • Phase 1: First formative feedback interviews

    Three student participants were interviewed to discuss their first feedback on formative assignments.
  • Phase 1: interview 2 on formative feedback

    Phase 1: interview 2 on formative feedback
    The first interview to discuss students reactions to their feedback on mid-term formative assignments.
  • Phase 1: Interview 3 on summative feedback interviews

    Week 6 of the term, the three participants were interviewed about their summative feedback.
  • Phase 1: Interview 3 formative feedback

    Interviews with students on their second formative assignments.
  • Phase one: Final student and tutor interviews

    Phase one: Final student and tutor interviews
    Interview 5 for students and second interview for tutors.
  • Phase 2 : Recruiting participants

    After a short presentation on language support options for MA TESOL students, I introduced my study and invited participants to contact me by e-mail if they wished to take part in the research.
  • Phase 2: Baseline interviews

    Weeks two and three of term, baseline interviews carried out with 8 student participants.
  • Formative feedback interviews :Tutors +students

    Formative feedback interviews :Tutors +students
    Tutors were interviewed to discuss the feedback they had written on the 8 students in the study; interviews with each student took place within a few days of these.
  • Teaching Advisory Group meeting: Discussion of porgress

    This was an important meeting with my supervisor and internal examiner, which discussed the way in which the study design had moved from first to second phase. I detailed decisions that led to a more refined set of research questions and a more aligned procedure linking tutor feedback with student responses.
  • Phase 2: Formative feedback tutor and student interviews

    Week 7 of term, tutor interviews carried out to discuss first formative feedback, followed by student interviews within one week of their receiving feedback.
  • TAG upgrade meeting

    This was the first submission of substantive work on the early chapters. I offically received notification of upgrade to the doctorate and received constructive feedback on how to rewrite and develop my design chapter.
  • Phase 2 Analysis

    Phase 2 analysis of cases and themes
  • TAG meeting to discuss draft chapter

    Final analysis of Phase 2, 6 case studies discussed. Thematic approach to chapter agreed.
  • Final thesis write up

    The final chapters and appendices were created at this point.
  • Submission of thesis

    The thesis was submitted and the date of the Viva set.