History of Special Education Law: 1954–Present

  • Brown v. Board of Education

    Brown v. Board of Education
    A landmark case that declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
    Impact: Established the legal foundation that "separate is not equal," influencing later decisions around access and inclusion for students with disabilities.
  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

    Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
    A federal law that provided funding for primary and secondary education, emphasizing equal access to education.
    Impact: Set the precedent for federal involvement in education and laid the groundwork for programs supporting students with disabilities. Legislation was passed under Johnson pictured
  • PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

    PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    A lawsuit that challenged Pennsylvania laws that excluded children with intellectual disabilities from public education.
    Impact: Required states to provide free public education to children with intellectual disabilities — a precursor to IDEA.
  • Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia

    Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia
    The court ruled that students with disabilities could not be excluded from public schools due to lack of funding.
    Impact: Reinforced the right to education for all children with disabilities, regardless of financial burden on the district.
  • Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) – PL 94-142

    Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) – PL 94-142
    Required public schools to provide free and appropriate public education (FAPE) to children with disabilities.
    Impact: Mandated IEPs, parent participation, and Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) — cornerstones of today’s Special Ed practices.
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

    Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
    A civil rights law prohibiting discrimination based on disability in all areas of public life.
    Impact: Broadened protections for students with disabilities beyond school — including access to buildings, transportation, and employment.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

    Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
    Reauthorization of EAHCA with increased emphasis on transition services and assistive technology.
    Impact: Reinforced FAPE, IEP, and LRE while addressing postsecondary transitions and inclusive technology supports.
  • No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)

    No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
    Increased accountability in education through standardized testing and reporting of results for all student groups.
    Impact: Emphasized performance of students with disabilities and their inclusion in accountability systems.
  • IDEA Reauthorization / Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act

    IDEA Reauthorization / Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act
    Aligned with NCLB; introduced Response to Intervention (RTI).
    Impact: Promoted early identification and data-driven instruction.
  • Forest Grove School District v. T.A.

    Forest Grove School District v. T.A.
    Supreme Court ruled parents may receive private school reimbursement without prior public services.
    Impact: Expanded FAPE protections and parental rights under IDEA.
  • Senate Bill 507 – Cameras in Special Ed Classrooms (Texas)

    Senate Bill 507 – Cameras in Special Ed Classrooms (Texas)
    Requires video/audio monitoring in certain self-contained special ed classrooms upon request.
    Impact: Promotes safety and transparency in Texas special education settings.
  • Texas Education Agency (TEA) Corrective Action Plan

    Texas Education Agency (TEA) Corrective Action Plan
    U.S. Department of Education found Texas limited special ed enrollment; TEA was ordered to fix this.
    Impact: Led to increased child find efforts and service access in Texas.
  • Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District

    Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District
    Supreme Court raised the standard of FAPE beyond “minimal progress.”
    Impact: Requires IEPs to enable meaningful academic and functional progress.
  • House Bill 3 – Transition and Special Education Funding (Texas)

    House Bill 3 – Transition and Special Education Funding (Texas)
    Expanded special ed funding and required transition planning improvements.
    Impact: Improved postsecondary outcomes and ensured funding for students needing accelerated instruction.