Allowed telecom monopolies to provide internet service
Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment Act of 2001: Voted to allow telecom monopolies to enter the high-speed Internet access market via their long-distance connections whether or not they have allowed competitors into their local markets as required under law. Bill HR 1542 Image Credit
Voted against Net Neutrality
Voted NO on HR 5252 Amendment 987, which would have prevented Telecoms from implementing "pay-to-play" restrictions on internet speed and removed the Telecom monopoly on providng internet service. InfographicImage Credit
Granted Warrantless Surveillance Immunity to Telecoms
Voted YES on HR6304, which granted immunity to those organizations engaged in warrantless surveillance Image Credit
Smith Introduces HR1981
HR1981 requires ISPs to track temporarily assigned network addresses (and potentially allows them to track other sensitive information). Retention of this information could have serious civil liberty consequences. SourceImage Credit
Smith introduces SOPA
Allows the U.S. Department of Justice to seek court orders to stop online ad networks and payment processors from doing business with foreign websites accused of enabling or facilitating copyright infringement without due process. SourceInfographicImage Credit
Feb. Markup of SOPA scheduled
Despite widespread opposition to the bill, Lamar Smith feels confident in scheduling the legislation for markup in February. Source Image Credit
Blackout SOPA protests
13 million people, 400,000 phone calls, and countless e-mails defeated a bill - 85 congresspeople immediately voiced their opposition as a result. InfographicImage Credit
SOPA is withdrawn
But Smith maintains: Congress cannot stand by and do nothing while American innovators and job creators are under attack. SourceImage Credit
Smith on SOPA: Start Over
In an interview, Lamar Smith says of SOPA "we need to wait and start over" Source
SOPA protest "misinformed"
Lamar Smith: "The language in the bill may have been aimed at taking on foreign piracy, but the definitions of foreign and domestic web sites in the original bill meant that it could be used to target a U.S. web site as well, if that U.S. web site was registered with a foreign domain name registrar." SourceImage Credit